15-year Comparison of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Anatomical or High Cup Placement for Crowe I to III Hip Dysplasia
Abstract
This study compared radiological and clinical results of Mallory-Head (Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana) cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) by anatomical (AP group) or high cup placement (HP group) for Crowe I to III developmental dysplasia of the hip. Of the 68 hips studied, 43 hips were available for 15.3-year follow-up. Ten cups were placed at anatomical center with bulk bone grafting, and 33 cups were at high hip center without bulk bone grafting. No acetabular or femoral components showed loosening in either group. One standard polyethylene liner in a highly placed cup was revised due to excessive wear after 11 years. The average rate of polyethylene wear was 0.128 mm/year in the AP group and 0.148 mm/year in the HP group (except for the revision case). The extent of grafted bone coverage was 34.6% in the AP group. Hip center height was 24.5 mm from the inter-teardrop line in the HP group. The center of the hip horizontal location in the AP group (24.5 mm) and HP group (26.4 mm) was significantly shorter than in normal hips (35.6 mm). Postoperative center-edge angle was 11° (except grafted bone) in the AP group and 25° in the HP group. Mean Harris Hip Score in the AP group improved from 38 points preoperatively to 82 points postoperatively and in the HP group improved from 40 points preoperatively to 88 points postoperatively. Survivorship was 100% in the AP group and 97% in the HP group. Our results indicate that moderate high cup placement without bulk bone grafting at a horizontal locus more medial than that of a normal hip is an alternative durable solution.
This study compared radiological and clinical results of Mallory-Head (Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana) cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) by anatomical (AP group) or high cup placement (HP group) for Crowe I to III developmental dysplasia of the hip. Of the 68 hips studied, 43 hips were available for 15.3-year follow-up. Ten cups were placed at anatomical center with bulk bone grafting, and 33 cups were at high hip center without bulk bone grafting. No acetabular or femoral components showed loosening in either group. One standard polyethylene liner in a highly placed cup was revised due to excessive wear after 11 years. The average rate of polyethylene wear was 0.128 mm/year in the AP group and 0.148 mm/year in the HP group (except for the revision case). The extent of grafted bone coverage was 34.6% in the AP group. Hip center height was 24.5 mm from the inter-teardrop line in the HP group. The center of the hip horizontal location in the AP group (24.5 mm) and HP group (26.4 mm) was significantly shorter than in normal hips (35.6 mm). Postoperative center-edge angle was 11° (except grafted bone) in the AP group and 25° in the HP group. Mean Harris Hip Score in the AP group improved from 38 points preoperatively to 82 points postoperatively and in the HP group improved from 40 points preoperatively to 88 points postoperatively. Survivorship was 100% in the AP group and 97% in the HP group. Our results indicate that moderate high cup placement without bulk bone grafting at a horizontal locus more medial than that of a normal hip is an alternative durable solution.